$ trigger

The trigger: contingent IP assignment that only fires on objective success.

You sign one contract at room join. It sits dormant. Either the project hits an objective success trigger — and ownership transfers atomically per the parameters everyone signed — or it dies, and the agreement quietly expires. No legal weight on the 98% that don't ship.

$ what's in here

$ success triggers (objective only)

The founder picks the success trigger at project creation. It must be objective — meaning a third party can verify it without asking anyone how they feel.

The accepted triggers at v0:

No "I declare this successful." No founder mood. The trigger fires from data, or it doesn't fire.

$ IP escrow, explained

HEIMLANDR (the entity behind EXITR) holds the IP in escrow during the build. Not the founder. Not the dev. A neutral third party, structured for exactly this purpose.

While the project is in flight, no one party can claim, sell, or weaponize the IP. When the trigger fires, ownership transfers atomically per the parameters everyone signed. When the project dies, the agreement expires and the IP returns to the original contributors.

The escrow exists because trust between strangers can't be assumed in 14 days. So we don't ask anyone to trust anyone — we just hold the keys.

$ what happens when a project dies

Most projects die. That's not a failure of EXITR — it's the entire reason EXITR exists. When a project dies:

98% of side projects don't ship. EXITR is built around that fact, not against it.

$ disputes go to the recording

When two people remember the same conversation differently, the platform doesn't take a side. The AI surfaces the recording chunks both parties referenced. Human review at Exitr ops makes the call, documented and shared with both sides. Outcome feeds behavior tier where relevant.

More on recording retention and consent → the room.

$ the lawyer reviewed all of this

EXITR is a Swedish LLC operating under HEIMLANDR.io. GDPR-default. EU privacy law applies to all users globally. The contingent assignment is being reviewed in a Sweden + Delaware dual template. Recording consent is being scoped to all-party and two-party recording laws across jurisdictions.

More on this lands as the lawyer brief finalizes pre-launch.